Wednesday, January 04, 2017

The Island of Misfit Shakespeare

How was everybody's Christmas?  Man it's feeling pretty neglected here lately.  Ye Olde Blogge is starting to look old.  I think it's going to be time for a change in the new year.

But!  Tradition does have it that I share my Shakespeare christmas with everybody and I'm not about to let that stop.

Let's start out with the twins.  I've actually had Shakespeare stickers on my work laptop since last year (I posted about a year ago during my "decorating your life" phase). But I've got another identical machine for personal use, that has to date been naked.  No longer!

Twins!

Ah, that's better. Now they match.   If you can't quite read it, the new one is the one on the left and has the "Some are born great..." quote from Twelfth Night.  It actually came as a big white sheet sticker as if they wanted me to cover the whole front with it, but I didn't like that so I carefully cut the good bits out and just used those. You can't quite see it in the picture but my son pointed out that the Apple logo behind it glows right through, and looks very cool.

Last year I got some Shakespeare pajamas that I wear every night, so as Christmas approached I told my wife directly, "This, I like this.  More like this.  You know, in case you need ideas."

This year I got two, and I love them both for how wacky they are. First is a colored shirt with a Merchant of Venice image and quote:


So far so good!  The quote is on the back:


I laughed out loud at the obvious mistake. Everybody sees it, right?  For a second I wanted to double check the text to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious (good tip for arguing politics on the internet - always be willing to entertain the possibility that you might be mistaken), but I was not.  "villains's".  It's as if the creator got halfway through the shirt and said, "Wait, is it s-apostrophe or apostrophe-s?  I can't be arsed to go look, just do both!"

My daughter said, "We should return it."

I said, "Are you kidding?  It's stuff like this that makes these conversation pieces! I love it."

The second one is even better, and it's all visual:


Man, Shakespeare does not look like he's having a good day.  I pondered aloud, "Why is he cross-eyed?" and our neighbor offered, "Because he's trying to look at the things he's juggling?"  Good idea.

"Is he wearing Chuck Taylors?" another asked.  I didn't even realize.  He is indeed.

What I noticed is what he's juggling. There's the comedy / tragedy masks, that makes sense. And a sword, fine, lots of Shakespeare scenes have swords.  The skull, that's gotta by Yorick.

But ... a lizard?  For the life of me I still cannot figure out why he is juggling a lizard.  He looks like Quincy, Jason's pet lizard in the comic Foxtrot.

I know it's a week+ late, but how was everybody else's Christmas?  I also got a gift certificate to Newbury Comics and am looking to grab the Deadpool/Shakespeare crossover whenever I can find it.  Anybody get anything cool?





Wednesday, November 30, 2016

The Satirical Rogue Says That Old Men Have Grey Beards #NoShaveNovember

Well I didn't write a novel, but I can say I reached the end of No Shave November!  Sometimes it's nice to just set yourself a personal motivational reminder that I can actually set my mind to do something for 30 days (or in this case, not do something) and actually follow all the way through with it.  Maybe for next month I'll try taking the stairs every day? :)


Thinking about shaving it down into something Shakespeare style, but I've never managed to make that work in the past and I end up getting rid of it.  Droeshout style has almost no beard, while Chandos when you look close goes all the way up the jaw line, which isn't a great modern look either.  I guess we'll have to see!

Seriously, though, go check out No Shave November and maybe share some links or donate some money. If you already did, thanks!

Monday, November 21, 2016

Your Loss, Beatrice.

"Lord, I could not endure a husband with a
beard on his face: I had rather lie in the woollen. " - Beatrice, Much Ado About Nothing
Every year around this time I like to take part in "No Shave November," otherwise known as "Woohoo I don't have to shave for two weeks!" followed by "Oh my god is it December yet this itching is going to drive me crazy!"

Seriously, though, sometimes it's nice to have a cause and try to do something meaningful:
The goal of No-Shave November is to grow awareness by embracing our hair, which many cancer patients lose, and letting it grow wild and free. Donate the money you typically spend on shaving and grooming to educate about cancer prevention, save lives, and aid those fighting the battle.
If I count Facebook and Twitter I've potentially got over ten thousand people that might see this post.  Maybe some of you might find it a cause worth supporting.  I don't really register and create my own page and that sort of thing, because it's not really about me. If you're in a position to donate and would like to do so, that's awesome. If you're not, then maybe you can share this post so more people see it. There's lots of ways to help.

Thanks for your support!  I'll update again later in the month!


Thursday, November 17, 2016

Horatio's Big Moment

I may have mentioned that I did not, at all, like Horatio in Benedict Cumberbatch's Hamlet. It wasn't just the over the top hipster characterization. He just didn't ... do, anything.  He's a nonentity in almost all of the play.  When we see him in the unusual scene one he's little more than a messenger with something very important to say, who is dismissed by Hamlet before he gets to say it.  Later it almost seems like he's heading out of town, having given up Hamlet for dead.

Except for one scene.  Hamlet's back, he's relayed the ridiculous story of how he escaped the pirates, and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are No More.  This takes Horatio a second to piece together, or maybe it just takes him a second to work up the guts to say it, but:

HORATIO
So Guildenstern and Rosencrantz go to't.

HAMLET
Why, man, they did make love to this employment;
They are not near my conscience; their defeat
Does by their own insinuation grow:
'Tis dangerous when the baser nature comes
Between the pass and fell incensed points
Of mighty opposites.

HORATIO
Why, what a king is this!
He yells that last line at Hamlet.  I think it's the only time he raises his voice.  Took me by surprise, actually. But I liked the interpretation.  Hamlet is in the middle of justifying how he's left two "friends" to their death and that he doesn't think twice about it, and Horatio has to say, "LISTEN TO YOURSELF! Were you supposed to be king? Is this the kind of king you would have been?"

Bardfilm tells me that this line can be interpreted as meaning Claudius -- agreement with Hamlet, getting back to the original "It was them or me, Claudius is the one that sent me to my potential death" argument.  If that's the case, then at least in this production Horatio would still be just a sniveling toady.  Hamlet's told him that he killed two guys and doesn't care, and Horatio's all, "Yeah, screw them!  Claudius is the real bad guy here, not you! Let's go get a scone and an espresso, I want you to read my Nanowrimo entry..."

(P.S. I feel obliged to point out here, for those that do not have the text handy, that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern do NOT typically know that they are taking Hamlet to his murder.  I wonder if Hamlet knew that, if it would have given him pause?)

A New (?) Theory About Hamlet's Ghost

One of the reasons I love Shakespeare is that every time I see a play, I see something that I've never considered before.  Beneficial Cinnabun's version is no different.

Consider the ghost's appearance in the bedchamber scene.  A standard question on high school exams is, "Is the ghost even real at this point, or is Hamlet insane?  How come we could see the ghost in the first two occurrences, but not this one?"

Coming away from Benvolio Concubine's version I'm left with a new idea.  What if the ghost is there because Hamlet is screwing up the plan, and he's here to save him?

It depends heavily on how you play it, but this version of Hamlet (I'm getting tired of thinking up variations for the man's name) is pretty heavy handed with all of the "Look, seriously, I'm not crazy I'm only pretending" clues.  It goes so far as having Hamlet himself dress up to take part in the play-within-a-play and pour the poison in his player father's ear, which is about as big an F-U to Claudius as you could imagine.  If that doesn't say "I know what you did" I don't know what would.

And now here he is lecturing his mother on "almost as bad dear queen as kill a king and marry with his brother" and everything that comes after.  I imagine the ghost hovering underneath the stones (a joke the "old mole" played for laughs earlier) thinking, "What is this kid doing???"

So he makes an appearance, where he basically yells at his son that he's doing everything wrong.  He's invisible to Gertrude, so it's going to look like Hamlet is suddenly talking to no one.  He comes as an angry ghost, so from Gertrude's perspective her son goes from yelling at her to apologizing to the wall.  Presto, now she's back in the "My son is crazy" camp.

One of the big questions is whether Gertrude knows what Claudius did, and/or was in on it.  But either way, she's still a mother dealing with her son, and as far as I know is very rarely shown to be more on Claudius' side than Hamlet's.  So, she's already sympathetic to his cause.  Maybe she doesn't know what Claudius did.  Maybe Hamlet is actually convincing her that maybe there's something to it.   Maybe, if the ghost doesn't appear, maybe she goes to Claudius and says, "Hamlet was in here muttering all kinds of weirdness about me murdering his father."  But that doesn't happen.  The ghosts appearance makes her firmly believe that her son is nuts and needs to be protected from a very irate Claudius.  She says nothing, other than the obvious murder thing.

I suppose most of the scene continues after the ghost disappears, so Hamlet's got plenty of time to talk sense to his mother.  Or, you could shuffle things around a bit so that all the logic comes first, then the ghost, and then she's left completely confused as to whether he's nuts or not.  Lots of potential room for interpretation I hadn't really considered before.


Review : Benebatch Cumberdink's Hamlet

Sorry, I should probably spell the man's name correctly if for nothing else than the SEO I might get, but it just amuses me to no end to spell it differently every time.

Last night, after months of waiting, I got to see the encore performance of B.C.'s Hamlet, presented by NTLive.

While I have some major issues with many of the directorial choices and was often making my Picard "WTF have they done to my Shakespeare?" face, I think that old Ben himself might individually be the best Hamlet I've ever seen.

Should we cover the good first, or the bad?  I'll start with the opening, and you tell me.  We open with Hamlet, sitting in what I presume to be his room (although it felt like it could have been an attic), listening to old records and looking through photo albums, presumably of his father.  I *loved* this.  When I try to relate the play to people I always start by saying, "Hamlet is about a man whose father died." Here we actually get a glimpse of him in mourning, not just in his inky black cloak, but actually going through the motions that you could expect anyone to go through that lost someone dear.  Before the scene is over he will go into a trunk of his father's clothes and don one of his father's blazers - but not before smelling it, once again to remind him of his father.  It's about 30 seconds into this 3+ hour play and you already know exactly what's going on in Hamlet's head.  Ever wonder what his relationship was like with his father? No questions here.

I figured ok, awesome start, lights out and we start the show, right?

Nope.  Knock knock knock.  "Who's there?" says Hamlet.  Says HAMLET.  SAYS HAMLET.  "Answer me, stand and unfold yourself!"  And I'm in bizarro world because Horatio enters and we're catapulted briefly to ... scene 5, was it?  Horatio's original meeting with Hamlet?  But but but but but but.... where's the ghost?  So confused.

It's a bold move to do stuff like that because you have to follow up with it and have it make sense and flow smoothly.  I don't think that did.  First of all, there's no reason to introduce Horatio there at all.  He doesn't do anything.  Second, we'll later be treated to Marcellus and Bernardo entering with, "My lord I saw him yesternight."  It's like they just cut the context and shuffled it around and didn't even attempt to smooth it over.  Boo.

Couple words on casting?  I hate hate hated Horatio.  If I could think of a way to blend the two words together I would. Horhatio maybe.  Imagine five minutes before showtime, somebody runs up to the director and says, "Bad news, our Horatio's been hit by a bus!"  "No problem," says the director, "Run down to the local Starbucks and grab the barista, he told me this morning that he played Horatio once in college."  Boom, done.  Checkered flannel shirt with the sleeves rolled up, a backpack that he never takes off, which gives him this hunched over sort of snivelly, groveling sort of character like he's afraid to look Hamlet in the eye. All of his lines are delivered with a constant shaking of his head.  He's also got some sort of speech impediment or something going on, which becomes more pronounced at the end of the play, where he sounds like he's got something in his teeth.  It became grating after awhile.

I also hate the ghost.  They deliberately cut all the dialog about describing the ghost's warlike appearance - I was waiting for the line about "wore his beaver up" because I like to see how Hamlet plays the "Then saw you not his face?" line.  But that's all gone.  When we eventually see the ghost he's dressed in normal kingly attire, not any sort of armor.  Fine.  But then he starts talking and oh dear god out comes this heavy accent....Irish, I think?  It was so horribly distracting I didn't know what to do with myself.  No attempt to make it booming or ghostly or anything.  Or regal for that matter.  He sounded like a cross between somebody's crotchety old grandfather, and the school janitor yelling at kids for running in the hall. I found it just laughably out of place.  Bardfilm liked it and suggests that he was channeling Olivier.  I don't remember Olivier's ghost well enough, so if he was, I missed it entirely.  He sounded entirely like he was chastising his son. Didn't get much of a loveable father/son relationship, as I think about it.  Remember this is a Hamlet who was smelling his father's scent on his old clothes a minute ago.  Now he's getting yelled at.

Those are my two biggest casting complaints.  Claudius I liked - and I could swear I recognize him from other works?  Have to check that out.  Kind of doing that big, puffed out chest thing, like he's "on" all the time and deliberately trying to present himself like a king.  Even in his delivery, which is why I mentioned above how different the ghost's was, because the ghost was supposed to be a king as well.  Having said that, he's pretty one-note the more I think about it.  I did like the paranoia that was coming off of him, though.  Especially after Polonius is killed, all his thoughts turn to "How do I make sure this isn't pinned on me?"  I don't recall that from, say, Patrick Stewart's Claudius.  He was all business and had everything in control up to the end.  This guy seems like he's always walking a tightrope with it all just falling apart.

I agree with Bardfilm that the first half of this production was significantly better than the second. Perhaps that's because we saw all the tricks once and then they didn't work multiple times. They do this cool "everything goes in slow motion" thing during Hamlet's soliloquies, and the first time you see it it's very neat.  But it's not as shocking the next couple of times.  One scene I loved was the "chase" to capture Hamlet after he's killed Polonius.  I don't know that it's always done this way, but this was a full-on "mobilize everyone in the castle, find Hamlet" manhunt, and it was awesome.  The lighting changed, the sound changed, everything.  You really got the feeling that, whether they loved Claudius or not, the whole castle jumped when he said jump.  More importantly, you realize that Hamlet was truly alone and that literally everyone in the castle was against him.  This was brought home (though perhaps accidentally) when he's captured and I noticed that Marcellus and Bernardo are the ones holding guns on him.  Bardfilm wondered if that might not just be a case of doubling "generic soldiers" but I like my interpretation better, like they are soldiers forced to do their job because the king said so, whether they've got personal feelings about it or not.

So, let's talk about Hamlet as a character. I absolutely loved it.  I believe that the key to understanding the entire play is to get inside Hamlet's head.  His father's died, his mother's remarried, he's had the crown stolen from him, his girlfriend won't talk to him and won't tell him why.  I think that there's this gap that modern audiences often fail to leap between "I understand the words and know what they're supposed to mean so I get what Shakespeare wants me to get", and, "I feel something for that dude, I know what he's going through."   You *bought* everything Cumberland Bendybits was putting out there. You really felt like he was going through the anguish.  All of my favorite "minor" scenes hit just the notes I've always wanted to see hit:

* "Mother, you have my father much offended!"  It's not "I'm exchanging word games with you because I'm a smartass," it's the tiniest of escape valves to let off the fury he has for her and his complete inability to understand how she could have done what she did.  This is where it's all going to come out, and that's just the start.  He's not superior at this moment, he's not going to put her in her place, he's a son desperate to understand how his mother could have done what she's done.

* The flute scene.  It's a simple enough scene where he makes R (or is it G?) look like an idiot.  But you feel how truly alone he is in that moment.  These are supposed to be his friends. Sometimes I see R&G interpreted as schoolmates who weren't really that close because Gertrude doesn't really have a feeling for who her son's friends are.  But here they really do look like old friends.  So when he asks "Then what makes you think you can play me so easily?" it's not "Aha, caught you in a trap!" It's a real question.  You were supposed to be my friend, but you too are in the employ of the guy that killed my father.

There are some overacted bits to be sure.  His emoting often comes out as screaming, particularly during Ophelia's funeral.  I still bought it, I just wasn't as sympathetic to it.  Sure, he's mourning Ophelia's death - but he's also the guy that crashed a funeral unexpectedly and is now trying to story top everybody that he's got more right to mourn than everybody else.

The ending is so rushed, it made me so sad.  I could have used another 15 minutes, easily.  It goes so fast you can barely tell when somebody's been wounded.  Horatio's the one to say "The drink is poisoned!" which was a little weird, I broke out my WTF face again, how does he know?  At least Gertrude (who is supposed to deliver the line) is in a better position to realize it.  But here, she dies as soon as she drinks it.  It's all chaos.

Overall I loved it and I want  a DVD so I can watch again with my kids. I want to pick apart all the individual delivery of every line.  Many times they tweaked words here and there, which I suspect will make people insane, but for the most part, I was ok with it.  What frustrates me most about that is not always being able to tell when they've changed a line, and when I've merely forgotten the original line.  I think this was a very approachable production. People laughed in the audience. Often, and not in high brow academic chuckle when you're the only few people who got the joke.  Everybody got the joke. Most of the time it came from Bibbityboo's delivery of key lines.

Go see it if you can.  No question.  It's one to discuss.  Will it become the standard for classroom learning?  Unlikely.  Too much stuff changed.  But will it be a popular choice among larger audiences?  I definitely think so.


Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Methinks I've Become Predictable

I walk into our regular morning meeting and they're apparently discussing, from what context I can gather, where you'd like to go when you retire.

"Probably just my house," says one.

"Or your porch," says the other.  "Be that You kids get off my lawn guy."

"Probably," the first one laughs.  "But I have a balcony, so, that'd be weird."

I piped in, "You kids get off my balcony. No, seriously, what are you doing here, this is private property! Help, police!"

"That'd be pretty creepy," agrees the first.

"Romeo and Juliet, first draft," I said.  "Romeo get off my balcony!"

"I KNEW YOU WERE GONNA MENTION ROMEO AND JULIET!" the first declares.  "We said balcony and I'm sitting here thinking, Duane's gonna mention Romeo and Juliet, I'm surprised he hasn't brought it up yet."

Curses, they're on to me!

Monday, October 24, 2016

The Complete Works of William Shakespeare et al.

I don't think many of us here hold to the strictly orthodox view that Shakespeare worked alone. I have no problem believing that the plays were a collaborative effort in many cases.  Looks like somebody's about to make this official, by crediting Christoper Marlowe as co-author of the Henry VI plays:

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/christopher-marlowe-to-get-co-author-credit-in-shakespeare-editions-a7377226.html
The Elizabethan tragedian’s name will appear next to the Bard’s on the title pages of Henry VI, Parts One, Two and Three when they’re published under the New Oxford Shakespeare by Oxford University Press this month.
Is it me or is this a reallllly slippery slope?  Wasn't collaboration the name of the game back then?  Wouldn't we logically reduce to the conclusion that all of the plays (and not just Shakespeare's) have multiple authors?  Isn't equally likely that Marlowe himself had co-authors on his own work?  Or do we think that this is just an attack on Shakespeare personally?

Also, why is it always Gary Taylor's name that's associated with this stuff?  Some of you may remember that he's also the primary driving force in deciding that Double Falsehood is really Shakespeare's long lost play Cardenio.

Those seem like opposite ends of the spectrum.  Do we want to go out of our way to find works to which we can attach Shakespeare's name, or to add other people's names next to Shakespeare's?

Monday, October 17, 2016

Random Shakespeare Sightings

Sunday night in a house with three kids can be chaos.  The boy is in the tub, the oldest is fretting over a test she has in biology in the morning, and my middle child is curled up in bed with my wife trying to find a show to watch.

"Daddy, come quick! Shakespeare!" they yell.  I'm busy quizzing my daughter on the relationship between apocryphal and deuterocanonical books in the bible, and my son wants to show me a cool bubble experiment he has concocted.  But eventually I break free and make it into the Shakespeare room.

A lady, who I recognize, is talking about Shakespeare.  But oh what is her name? That's going to drive me crazy. I know I know her.

Then it switches. "Oh, well, I know that guy," I say, looking past the scruffly beard and mustache and the very recognizable eyes.  "That's Ralph Fiennes."

"THOR!" my daughter exclaims.

I'm not sure where she got that.  "Really?  No, he wasn't in Thor."  (It just dawned on me writing this that she's confusing him with Tom Hiddleston.)

"VOLDEMORT!" she tries again.

"There you go.  Yes he was Voldemort."

Cut back to other lady.  *snap* "I know who that is, that's Julie Taymor! Duh, obviously."

My wife and daughter look at each other like Daddy's gone cuckoo.

I pull myself away from the screen to deal with other children, but make it back to another guy I recognize.  It's Hugh Bonneville from Downton Abbey, who I actually haven't seen do much Shakespeare.  I mistakenly associate him with the scientist in the Thor movie, but with a little IMDB help I realize I'm confusing him with Stellan Skarsgard.

Turns out the show was "Shakespeare Uncovered", season two episode one. I know of the show but haven't really followed it, so somebody enlighten me - did season two just start, or is that an old re-run we stumbled across?

Thursday, October 06, 2016

My Reputation Proceeds Me (and I Love It)

My company's got about 100 people in it. That doesn't mean I've met or interacted with many of them.  As a pretty solid introvert I'm not one to just start conversations, or introduce myself to people first.    I probably know you and what you do, but chances are unlikely that we're going to sit together at lunch unless I'm there first and you sit down.

Anyway.  Yesterday at work one of the guys from downstairs, who is firmly in this category, is suddenly behind me.  Turns out that a random test email broke one of our filters and he was trying to chase down who'd created it.  Since it had football words in it he came to me / my boss, since we both follow football and are involved in pools and fantasy.  But no, it was not us who had created the test email, so we pointed him at another football fan on our floor who might be his culprit.

As he was leaving I said, "If you ever get one that's a Shakespearean character, that's probably me though."

To which he replied, "Well, yeah, we know that."

(What's funny is that's the second time that's happened.  Even the people who I've never spoken with know me as the Shakespeare guy.)


Wednesday, October 05, 2016

Can I Get A Cape? I Think I'd Look Good In A Cape

This morning in the kitchen at work I was talking politics with the CEO, and Shakespeare came up. Why? Because he acknowledged the Shakespeare stickers on the front of my laptop.  He said something about Shakespeare hundreds of years ago already having said some wise things about all politicians.  I said that just recently I'd forwarded around an article comparing Joe Biden's advice to Hillary Clinton, and Shakespeare's.

Then it got interesting.  He told me that one of his (four) daughters is in college, and she's studying Shakespeare, and that *he* (her father, my CEO) was assigned homework.  They're studying Hamlet's girlfriend's father's speech - what's his name?

"Polonius."

Right, Polonius. He has that whole soliloquoy about neither a borrower not a lender be or however it goes, and we're supposed to write back with what advice we sent out kids off to college with.  And here I am thinking, "What else can I say? This guy said it pretty good!"

That was about the end of that conversation, but it got me thinking.  Later in the day, when he was back at his desk but his door was open, I knocked, and here's what I said:

In case I haven't made it obvious, I always thought it kind of goes without saying, but if you, or really anybody here, if your kids ever have Shakespeare homework or ever need any kind of help with the subject, you absolutely come and you get me. The idea that there might be kids that don't get it, while I'm around and could help them? That bothers me.  I can't have that. When it comes to homework I might not always have the answer that they need, because usually the teacher isn't asking questions about your gut feeling or your personal interpretation of the play, they want the academic answer that comes straight out of the textbook, and I don't always have that. But in that case what I do have is thousands of followers on social media, many of whom are PhDs and academics who do this stuff full time and know a lot more than I do, and I can ask them and then I can play middle man and I can translate. Then we all learn something.
Shakespeare Man!

Funny how life's changed in the decade I've been doing this.  I used to cringe to open my mouth about Shakespeare because I always just assumed that whoever was interested enough in talking to me about the subject would by default also know more about the subject than me, and I was always worried about saying the wrong thing.  Somewhere along the line I embraced that. I don't have all the answers, and I never will.  When I don't, I ask, and then I learn, and maybe I'll have the answer next time somebody asks me.  Because chances are very good that the people asking me questions don't ever get a chance to ask questions of the Shakespearean professionals that I have access to at this point.

What I do have is a deep seated belief that Shakespeare can be experienced and understood by everybody, and that doing so makes life better, and that when I'm able to help that mission in any way I can, it makes me very happy indeed.

Monday, September 26, 2016

How Far That Little Candle Throws His Beams

I've got a question for you.

I'm going to assume, since you're reading this, that you like Shakespeare.  Maybe you're a theatre geek in general, or maybe like me you've got no particular connection to the theatrical world, you just love Shakespeare's work.  You've probably got a bunch of it memorized, too, if by pure repetition if nothing else.

So here's my question.  How many friends have you got that you talk about Shakespeare with?  Sure, if you're in a theatre group in the first place the answer to this question might be obvious.  But what about your friends, your family, your coworkers? If your life is anything like mine, most folks you encounter have little more than a passing high school knowledge of the man and his work. Most will never bother to learn any more than that, because they're adults now and their time for being told what they have to learn is over.  There's bills to be paid and fantasy football teams to draft.

Why can't we change that?

Why can't we introduce Shakespeare and his work to children from the time that they're born?  Fine, there's plenty of stuff in Shakespeare that's over the head of most college students, let alone toddlers.  Dr. Seuss wrote propaganda cartoons during World War II, too.  But I'll bet we can all quote Cat in the Hat.

How great would the world be if everybody you ran into on a daily basis was as familiar with "I know a bank where the wild thyme blows, where ox-lips and the nodding violet grows" as they are with "One fish two fish, red fish blue fish?"

"To be or not to be" and "Wherefore art thou" have tipped over into cliche, but wouldn't you love to hang out with somebody who not only recognized "Be not afeard, the isle is full of noises," but could complete it with, "sounds and sweet airs that give delight and hurt not?"

Shakespeare is poetry.  Children learn language through rhyme and poetry.

Shakespeare painted pictures with words.  Children learn words through association with images.

There's absolutely no reason why somebody can't take Shakespeare's poetry and Shakespeare's pictures and put them in the hands of new parents to read to their children from day one. You know what happens when that happens?  Those kids like it. Those kids ask for it. Those kids want more.
Most importantly, those kids grow up with Miranda and Ariel and Titania and Oberon in their brains right next to Winnie the Pooh and Piglet and the Wild Things and the Lorax and Alice and the Mad Hatter...

Before that little candle can throw its beams, somebody has to light it, and that is precisely what Erin is trying to do.


I know I've bugged you all about this already, but her Kickstarter deadline draws near, and she hasn't hit the goal yet, so she still needs help.  Back this project.  Get this book into existence. I don't care if you've got kids.  Mine aren't going to read this.  But I backed it. Because I want others to be able to read it. Imagine one day going to the store (if they still have bookstores!) and seeing Shakespeare in the baby book section. Even better imagine buying it and giving something you love as a give to someone you love.








Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Maybe Angelina Should Try More Shakespeare?

When I heard that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have filed for divorce it wasn't that interesting to me.

Then I heard the rumor that they're divorcing because he's having an affair with Marion "Lady Macbeth" Cotillard, and now we've got something to talk about!

In case you missed it, here's our review of the 2015 Macbeth starring Cotillard and Michael Fassbender.

Although Pitt and Cotillard are apparently working together on a new project that hasn't come out yet, who knows? Maybe he saw her in that and liked the whole Shakespeare vibe.  I can't find any Shakespeare in Pitt's biography, but I do see that Gwynneth Paltrow, who went on to win an Oscar for Shakespeare in Love, claims that after he broke up with her she was almost too distraught to audition for the role (item #10).

Perhaps Brad never knew that Ms. Jolie has some Shakespeare in her past as well?  No, I'm not talking about Cyborg 2 or Hackers, both classics in their own right.  Nor do I mean her epic Cleopatra project that was the star of the Sony email debacle a few years back.

I'm talking about Love is All There Is, a 1990's Romeo and Juliet re-telling set in an Italian restaurant in the Bronx.  Angelina plays our Juliet.  It also happens to be available in full on YouTube.

Please share and enjoy:


(Trivia -- looks like Paul Sorvino is in this, and then again in Romeo+Juliet just a couple of years later.  Apparently as a palate cleanser. :))

Monday, September 19, 2016

Three Projects To Get Excited About

When I read a headline that the Actors Hall of Fame was bringing back Shakespeare classics after 20 years I thought, "What, something like the Criterion collection? DVDs?"  Nope, I'm completely wrong. They're doing multiple ground-breaking things that look crazy exciting!

A MidSummer Night’s Dream will be produced as a state of the art family animated film, with the addition of new songs and dances from established and emerging artists. The film will be released globally in midsummer 2018.​
All my children's lives I've wanted "start of the art family animated film" versions of Shakespeare.  I just hope this one hasn't got gnomes in it.

The Taming of the Shrew will be produced as a 10 hour miniseries for broadcast/streaming, and will also introduce the next generation of characters in the lives of Petruchio and Katherina.
I've seen rumors that at least three major television networks are doing some version of a Shakespeare series, including a Romeo and Juliet sequel. The idea of a mini series is an interesting one, because you can tell a determined story arc without worrying about having to create ongoing material for several seasons.

Romeo and Juliet  the classic story of young love will make history by airing ‘LIVE’ on mobile and social media around the world starring today’s most popular young stars from film, television and music.
Since joining Twitter back in 2008 I've been inundated with every possible combination of live tweeting the plays in "text speak" from various accounts behaving in the persona of the individual characters, and I've never liked it. I'm at least curious what "airing live on social media" means because I am interested in the advancement of the technologies to do that, however.

Should be very interesting to keep an eye on these projects!



Thursday, September 15, 2016

More Strange Than True: Yay! More Midsummer Movies!

Look what I found in my browsing today!  Behold More Strange Than True, coming soon to a cinema near you (assuming you are in the UK):
After beheading her husband, Queen Titiana takes over the mystical woods where lost souls and ghouls wander about confused in this surrealist film inspired by William Shakespeare's 'A Midsummer Night's Dream'.
First thought:  "Wait, did they spell Titania wrong or did they do that on purpose?"  It's listed that way as well in the credits so I guess it's Tie-tee-AH-na instead of Tie-TAY-nee-ah.

Second thought: "After beheading her husband..." who the...what the.....huh?

I'm not quite sure what to expect out of this one, but I think Bardfilm is going to have a field day if this summary from the director is any indication:
Writer/Director Ben Rider originally intended to adapt A Midsummer Night's Dream into a musical. He abandoned the idea when he decided his vision to interpret the play as a post-modern homage to German Expressionist cinema, particularly the works of German filmmaker F.W. Murnau, mixed with the stylistic films of Guy Maddin, such as Archangel (1990), would be better suited to the surreal elements of Shakespeare's writing.
What? Who? How?  Is Death going to ride in on a bicycle with his scythe hanging out of a grocery bag like a baguette?

Anybody in the UK recognize any of these names, or their work?

Thursday, September 08, 2016

The World Needs Shakespeare Baby Books

This blog started in 2005, when my first child was just barely three years old.  She's now entering high school and has two younger siblings.  They've grown up with Shakespeare.  It goes without saying that if I could have found age appropriate Shakespeare material for them since birth, I would have been all over it.  True there was that short lived "Baby Einstein" series that had a "Baby Shakespeare" offering, but that was really just random poetry and nothing especially Shakespeare.

My kids are grown now and reading Shakespeare on their own, but I think about all the new and soon to be parents out there that are in the same situation that I was, that maybe want some Shakespeare stuff for baby, and aren't finding it, but don't have a great soapbox like I do :)

So that is the reason I'm very excited about this Kickstarter for Behowl the Moon,  a "board book" based on A Midsummer Night's Dream and aimed at ages 0-3.


It's important to get the word out about a project like this.  It's not the kind of thing that goes straight to viral and makes its goal in half an hour.  At the time of this post they're about 1/3rd of the way there, and I seriously hope that they make it.  I keep saying my kids are too old, but as my pal Bardfilm reminded me, one day I'll need something to read to the grand babies.  Can you just imagine?  Passing our love of Shakespeare down two generations?  I just can't even.

Projects like this seeing the light of day pave the way for other projects to do the same, and the world gets more Shakespeare for all ages, and before you know it there's generations of geeklets growing up with love, rather than fear, of the greatest writer the world has ever known.  Who says you can't change the world? Go big or go home.

I know that money's a funny thing and not all of us have the kind of disposable income we wish we had.  But I also know that I've got well over ten thousand followers, all with friends and family and followers of their own, so take a moment and hit whatever version of the "share" button you prefer and keep spreading the word! Let's push them over their goal and get this thing made!

Behowl the Moon: An Ageless Story from Shakespeare's MSND


Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Review : Heuristic Shakespeare with Sir Ian McKellen

This review is all kinds of late, given that the app was released back in April for Shakespeare’s 400th anniversary. But an app this complex takes time to review properly, and.I wanted to do it justice. I really, really wanted to like this app. I just don't, and it makes me sad.

I’ve imagined an app like Heuristic Shakespeare forever. A true multimedia creation that allows you to explore Shakespeare’s work in the way that works for you. Do you want to read, or watch video? Do you want it paraphrased and explained to you, or do you want the original text? How about both? How about actors like Sir Derek Jacobi and Sir Ian McKellen reading the text to you? I think that alone is part of the genius of this app. They're not acting it, this is not a performance. They’re reading it like an audio book - but, this being an iPad, there’s still video. So it’s like the greatest Shakespeare talent of our generation is your own personal tutor, reading alongside you.

The problem that there is just oh so much packed into the app, that the interface is a mess. Half the time I find myself just pressing random buttons, never sure what comes up next. Sometimes I’ve got the text, sometimes I’ve got a character map telling me (with little thumbnail faces) which characters appear in which scenes. Oh, wait, now it's a modern English translation. Hold on, now I’ve got essays and videos *about* the play.

I love that all of this stuff is in there. Imagine it, you’re on a particular scene you’ve always liked. First you have Sir Ian reading it to you. All the hard words are highlighted and footnoted so you an always pause and make sure you understand what’s being said. Do you understand what’s happening in the scene? Flip to the modern translation and get a quick refresher. How has this scene been performed? Click somewhere else and you get a historic list of famous performances, complete with images. If you’re into the academic side (maybe you’re doing your homework), there’s also a mode where you can learn all about character development and themes and all that fun stuff your teacher requires that sucks the life out of just sitting back and enjoying the show :)

I have a perfect example of my frustration. I’ve mentioned several times that our greatest Shakespeareans can read the text along with you, in video, right? I lost that. I cannot find it, and I want it. I can get audio, but my video has disappeared. I don’t know if it’s a bug in the app where it’s legitimately no longer showing me an option that it’s supposed to, or if I’m doing something wrong, or what. And I think my regular readers probably know that I’m not exactly a newbie at this stuff. If I can’t figure it out, something’s wrong.

[UPDATE - I found it!  The videos only appear when the app is in portrait mode.  I was reading in landscape.  Very happy to have found my videos again.  Of course, my iPad is in a keyboard case so it's much more convenient to keep it in landscape but I guess I'll live.]

This app needs to exist. It’s the closest I’ve ever seen to the ideal Shakespeare browser. If I recall it’s on the expensive side for a mobile app — did they want $5.99 for it? But if you told me that’s the “player” price and that I can add content for additional plays at a lower amount, it’s a no brainer.

I just hope that they rethink large parts of the interface. I don’t know how, exactly, but it needs something. This is an app that even has a built in “What level of detail would you like?” feature so that it can be enjoyed by amateurs and scholars alike, so you’d think that a great amount of effort went into the design of the interface. Unfortunately I think it all went into trying to cram in as many trees as possible, and they lost track of the forest.




Tuesday, August 30, 2016

I Think I Resent This Article

I've often said "The mission is working" when random friends and coworkers bring me Shakespeare references.  I smile and think, "I've had an impact on this person's life. If they didn't know me, they would never have recognized and paid special attention to that Shakespeare."

So it was when my coworker Bryce tapped on the aquarium-like glass wall of my cubicle this morning, holding up a copy of the Wall Street Journal emblazoned with a huge First Folio image.  I immediately waved him over.


Conspicuous Consumption for Shakespeare Junkies

I don't know how to describe the tone of the article, but I don't like it.  "It's called one of the rarest books in the world," it begins, "but it's not - not by a longshot."  After all, 233 copies exist and "more are always turning up."

If you cringe at the term "bardolatry" you're going to have a conniption over "bibliographic fetishization" that "can't be explained in rational terms." Because, you see, most modern editions of Shakespeare don't even follow the First Folio, because it's so full of printing errors. The theory that all the punctuation and spelling choices are Shakespearean directorial choices is a "dubious" one at best, you see, because Shakespeare died before the FF was published and no original manuscripts exist.

It goes on like that, questioning whether there's any scholarly purpose for the Folger collection to even exist, and making it a point to let the reader know that Charlton Hinman's implausible theory of five compositors is "nothing of cosmic importance" and can only lead to the conclusion, "So what?"

I feel like the entire article is trolling us, and I'm not going to respond. I'm going to forget the author's name (which I have not bothered to include here), and will promptly forget it myself in the morning.  If Shakespeare makes life better, as we believe, I hope the author is happy with his average life. He doesn't understand what he's missing.

No, you know what? I'm not going to end there.  I'm going to remind my readers of the time I got to see the Most Beautiful Book in the World, and something a different co-worker said to me:
"You look so happy!" she said. "Look how happy you look! It must be amazing to be that passionate about something that it can make you that happy."
The author of this article will never understand that.


How To Think Like Shakespeare

Scott Newstok is a name I recognize. He was one of the very first contributors to Shakespeare Geek, dating all the way back to January 2008 when he sent me a copy of his book about Kenneth Burke.  This was at a time when I was still re-blogging links to Wikipedia pages and pretending that I knew anything at all about the subject :)

So when I saw everybody sharing How To Think Like Shakespeare by Scott Newstok I thought, "Hey, I know him!" Sure enough, by the time I got home from work there was an email from Scott waiting for me.

Scott's article, taken from a convocation address he delivered, is what I mean when I say, "Shakespeare makes life better." I've always seen our mission statement as having a great deal in common with "The unexamined life is not worth living." It's not about "How will memorizing passage X, Y and Z get me a job that pays 10% more than the other guy?" That's such small thinking, I've never understood what to do with that. It's about a picture so much bigger than that, and I love pointing to places where people smarter than I have said it better than I can.

Through Shakespeare, Scott reminds the class of 2020 that they have "an enviable chance to undertake a serious, sustained intellectual apprenticeship. You will prove your craft every time you choose to open a book; every time you choose to settle down to write without distraction; every time you choose to listen, to consider, and to contribute to a difficult yet open conversation."

"Do not cheat yourselves," he tells them. I tell that to everyone I meet, whenever the subject comes up. Oh, you never paid attention to Shakespeare in school? So what, what's stopping you now? There comes a time when you are in charge of your own education, and it never ever stops. Why would you ever miss an opportunity to make your life worth living?

Great job, Scott! Always happy to show off your stuff.



Monday, August 29, 2016

We Are The Music Makers, and We Are The Dreamers of Dreams

You've likely heard by now that Gene Wilder has passed away. He was 83.  As has become tradition here on the blog, we like to look back at those icons of stage and screen who made life better with the help of Shakespeare.

Mr. Wilder's most famous role must surely be that of the original, the one and only Willy Wonka.  Here's our good friend @Bardfilm's video take on all the Shakespeare references in this masterpiece from our childhood:


Did you know that Wilder's first performance in front of a paying audience was in a production of Romeo and Juliet when he was 15?  He played Balthasar.  (That's ok, I didn't know that either until I read his wikipedia page :))

But wait! There's more.  Gene Wilder was actually born Jerome Silberman. Where and why did he get Gene Wilder?  "Jerry Silberman as Macbeth didn't have the right ring to it," he thought when he joined the Actor's Studio, choosing Wilder from Thornton Wilder and Gene from Thomas Wolfe's Look Homeward, Angel. He later said that he couldn't imagine Gene Wilder playing Macbeth either :).  Our loss - I can't find any record of him ever trying.

Though it has nothing to do with Shakespeare, I love the trivia that Gene Wilder basically rewrote the part that made him famous, Willy Wonka, including such specifics as the entrance where his cane sticks in the cobblestones and he does his little somersault entrance. He also entirely redesigned the costume.  So shines a good deed in a weary world...

Those who know a little more about Wilder's personal story know that he never fully got over the death of his wife Gilda Radner from ovarian cancer.  At last they're reunited.

Good night, sweet prince. Flights of angels sing thee to thy rest.